This project is the result of multiple, intentionally divergent design passes. Rather than collapse those perspectives into a single voice, we preserve their tension.
Failure-First Orientation
The project treats failure as the primary signal of interest. Success is neither assumed nor privileged. Safety is examined through breakdown, recovery, and interaction over time.
Complementary Design Lenses
We explicitly privilege different lenses for different concerns:
Executable Rigor
Contracts, schemas, and validation. Prioritizes clarity, consistency, and testability. Every dataset is schema-validated, every claim is structured for verification.
Failure Realism
Episodes, dynamics, and drift. Prioritizes emergent behavior, recursion, and human interaction. The world does not conform to clean schemas—this lens ensures we capture what actually happens.
Governance Clarity
Contributing guidelines, safety gates, and CI. Prioritizes auditability, responsibility, and constraint visibility. Research that cannot be audited cannot be trusted.
No single lens is sufficient.
On Alignment
This project does not treat alignment as a solved or binary property. Instead, alignment is understood as fragile, contextual, and continuously renegotiated through interaction.
On Guarantees
Conformance to benchmarks or schemas in this repository does not imply safety, correctness, or alignment. It indicates only that a system has been evaluated within defined failure-oriented constraints.
Evolution
Taxonomies, schemas, and benchmarks are expected to evolve as new failure modes are discovered. Stability is pursued cautiously and only where it does not obscure risk.